In this age of
internet and extreme entertainment, I sometimes feel out of place, as though I belong in a more sheltered era. For example, I have
Facebook friends who post lewd messages and pictures, which always set me out of sorts but must make other people simply laugh. I do appreciate an occasional clever remark with innuendo, but crude, crass jokes and pictures really sort of upset me, and I wonder if I'm the only one. Honestly, I never thought I was so 'prudish' until fairly recently.
Yesterday, I went to sit in on orientation for a liberal sex education class for children. I did not bring Alex, as I wanted to gauge the class and see if it was something I wanted for him. If it had been nature-based, as in focusing on physiology and basic science, I may have been open to it. We saw a movie once with a young Native American boy who understood about deer mating, which shocked the white schoolteachers and prompted punishment, but which seem optimal to me. The boy probably also understand about human sex and how it produced children. If this liberal sex education had been about natural sexuality and how it relates to life and our wholesome families, I may have been alright with it.
However, I stayed for about 15 minutes and left, practically in tears. I am mystified at how my 10 year old boy in any way should be prompted to think about cultural sexual norms and deviations and vulgarities (e.g., associated slang speech). This class was designed for 5
th and 6
th graders to last over 8 sessions! Why does he need to spend that much time on this subject and why delve into vulgarities and deviations at such a young age? The implicit answer seem to be empowerment and development of tolerance, but I dissent.
Alex should be focusing on his studies, on his pets, on his
Yu-
gi-oh cards, on his sports... They suggested that the children are exposed to blatant sexuality in our media anyway, but Alex leads a rather sheltered life in his Montessori school. We don't have cable, and my children watch
pre-approved videos for entertainment. I'm not drastic--they see plenty of violence with Harry Potter movies and Hot Wheels and other fantasy and cartoon pics. Alex reads environmental newsletters and is thus acutely aware of destructive environmental concerns. The stories we read and listen to often have quite a bit of romantic energy, but these usually culminate in a kiss, a confirmed romantic link, and not much more.
Anyway, Alex is somewhat fortunate to be so sheltered, but many other children could be, as well, if their parents attempted to make it so. Why do they have a need to be worldly? Is it really beneficial for them to be so "empowered" with information that they neither need nor should be burdened with? I did sit down and explain the physiology of sex with him one day, when he kept asking about
how babies are made (and wanted more information than my prior genetics-based explanations). He listened for a bit and allowed me to finish, and then he asked to go outside and play. He never brought it up again and I'm not even sure that he fully understood my explanation, though he said he did at the time. I simply bring that up to demonstrate that I'm not trying to hide important information from him.
The other day, Fiona saw a 4 year old wearing a denim miniskirt,
dangly earrings, makeup, and high heels. She had long
blonde hair and was quite the 4-yr-old
hotpants. Ms.
Hotpants is also a cheerleader and demonstrated some very suggestive moves, prompting one mom to remark, "wow,
cheerleading has changed a lot since I was a girl."
Fiona, of course, noticed Ms.
Hotpants and wanted to know why I wouldn't let her wear makeup, too, and I actually had trouble coming up with much more of an answer than, "because you're too young."
I never considered myself a 'nun' with regards to sexuality. I had crushes on boys, and I always revelled in subtle flirting and such. I even read romance novels a bit, mostly as a teenager, but I still enjoy the romance in the Twilight stories and such. I have seen nudity to a great degree in my clinical practice, too, and I could almost swear that certain people have made a point of trying to make me more worldly with their lewd jokes and pictures and such, so I don't feel that my attitude is for lack of exposure. I grew up with no restrictions on my television habits, and I did see my fair share of MTV.
Frankly, though, I am overwhelmed at the preponderance and acceptance of blatant sexuality in our media and increasingly so in our casual relationships, such as on
Facebook. I'm not referring to flirting, but to simple lewd humor.
I won't even begin on pornography, but you probably can guess my views. I suppose no one thinks of herself as prudish or uptight, and, for goodness sakes, I'm a massage therapist and used to routinely give physical exams as a
naturopathic physician! I do not have any hang-ups about the human body, and I have few qualms about addressing and discussing sexual issues. It's simply the lack of respect for the subject itself and for the innocence of children that bothers me...
I took a
Facebook quiz last month that placed me in my appropriate era in history, and the quiz set me in the Victorian era, though I don't believe I gave particularly prudish answers. After leaving the sex education orientation in disgust, though, I'm not sure...
I do want to make one unique point in my defense, though. My last blog was about creating pathways of less resistance when we muse and ponder over certain topics. If we 'force' our ten-year-
olds to think about sex and define lewd terms for them, then we are creating a pattern that they're more likely to dwell on in the future. Not to say that sex won't naturally be a preoccupation when they become teenagers and young adults, and perhaps that will be an appropriate time to address it, but it seems to me that this will only strengthen that focus and preoccupation with sex before the time comes. Not to imply, again, that there's anything wrong with sex or that we want them to be repressed, but I believe keeping it in perspective and at a respectful, contained level is the healthy way to go.
In reading back through this, it seems as though I'm oscillating from one viewpoint to another, but I think what I'm trying to do is draw the line between healthy, respectful, appropriate knowledge and an excessive, inappropriate, disrespectful, and unnecessary focus on sexuality. I want to preserve the innocence of childhood as much as possible and not push or encourage them into early sexual awareness, while still answering their legitimate questions honestly and fairly, within reason.