I just read an article by an organic farmer at http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22627.cfm. I receive the Organic Consumer Association's newsletter and always find it interesting, even though I often disagree with them quite a bit. In fact, I haven't joined the organization, as they make some pretty shoddy choices on their activism, in my opinion. Yes, they trod on sacred ground...they attacked Starbucks. There was this whole 'Frankenbucks' campaign that absolutely lost them my support, and I fervently believe they were wrong in attacking a fairly eco-friendly company (as in, they're more likely to cave to our pathetic pressure than those other companies!). However, despite their BIG misstep there ;), I still like to read their articles.
I suppose I'd say that their big problem is their total dissociation from--no, antagonistic behavior towards--the larger economy and society. They're right more than I'd like to admit, though. For example, they disliked when the mainstream grocery stores started carrying organics--because it put health food stores out of business. They don't like big conventional farmers going for the organic seal--again, it's hard for the little guy to compete. Of course, given who runs the organization (small organic farmers and health food store owners), it does make sense that they're protective of themselves. However, I found their views on these matters petty...until I saw some of the anticipated fallout. For, once the mainstream stores induced us organically-inclined folks to shop in their convenient locales, they've slowly been weaning us from our organic products. One by one those products have been disappearing, and, rather than go to the trouble of visiting the health food store, we opt for just-one-more 'conventional' product at a time. It's convenient.
I don't know if there was any subterfuge intended, but that has been the effect. Not that I'm saying I agree with OCA--just that I don't feel as contrary towards their views as I had.
Back to the article, though. They argue, as any good health extremist should, for the new gold standard of both local and organic foods. They bring up Barbara Kingsolver--a brilliant, poetic, self-righteous, obnoxious, egotistical, truthful genius. I adore her and can't stand her. My biggest gripe? She doesn't want to be vegetarian, so she justifies her position to the extent that she wants to convert vegetarians to her choices--which are even more restrictive and risky than ours, in my opinion. She argues for buying local, organic, free-range meats...a far, far more ethical choice than most meat-eaters make. However, in her deranged 'conversion' of vegetarians to her meat-loving way of life, I wonder how many of them are going to continue opting for 'veg' foods when the local, organic, free-range meats aren't available, or when their money is tight? She's doing a big disservice to animal welfare and the environment with her misguided attempts to induce vegetarians to eat animals. Perhaps she has the personal strength and ethics to insist upon 'ethically' produced food, but I even wonder at that. Grr...her inspiring (yes, it was) book Animal, Vegetable, Miracle relates her family's experience of restricting themselves mostly to local foods in North Carolina for a year. My heart went out to her young daughter, who begged for fruit, only to be refused by her pompous, judgmental mama. Guess who went to Italy later in the year and ate out at restaurants and totally violated her strict locavore diet? Yes, the mama--with little to no compunction, only scoffing at the critics and justifying her own 'moderation'. Grr! However, while I do feel terribly sorry for the little girl in some respects, she is a lucky duck to be growing up next to such a powerful mind. Barbara Kingsolver is an amazing, brilliant woman--and I've no doubt that her daughter is overall 'lucky' to have such a mother. But geesh, poor kid...
Oops, once again, back to the article! The article argues against the move towards 'local' foods over 'organic' foods and makes some pretty solid points. However, a KEY factor they neglect to mention is that local, fresher foods have far more nutritive value than old food--often the problem with imported, shipped goods. Also, they don't really acknowledge the fact that some local farmers don't attend to the many, complicated requirements for the 'organic' seal because it's so danged expensive and cumbersome.
However, I did appreciate their points, and the article made me very pleased that I, at the last moment last week, signed up for weekly local, organic produce boxes once again (first disbursement tomorrow!). I have a few reservations, but I've really fallen into buying mostly from my local Food Lion with its non-local foods these days and would like to get back to a more healthy, environmentally-friendly diet.
Oh, on the local foods note, our chickens have started laying eggs again! It's so exciting after weeks of nothing much at all. We only have two chickens at the moment, but in the spring that translates to nearly two eggs daily--a significant amount for us. They forage in the yard and eat table scraps and a bit of bird food and scratch feed, but, after the initial investment in the coop and all, they're not really much expense at all. No, they're not 'organic'...we buy cheap feed to supplement what they get (gosh, it would seem ironic to buy them organic food and not us, wouldn't it?), but they seem like pretty happy chickens. They run all over the yard, scratch madly through leaves and straw, eat bugs...we don't clip their wings, either. I think they're pretty happy hens, and I'm relieved at the thought of not buying more store eggs. We plan to get a couple more chicks this spring, too, at some point. I'd ideally like to get to the point where we're able to share eggs with friends and neighbors. Wouldn't that be nice?
Also, though we're not going for a real garden this spring, Michael's planted some lettuce starts and a whole lot of basil seeds (basil is fabulous as fresh greens in soups and sandwiches). We're watering them right now with water from our rain barrels--an economical as well as environmental choice. Last year, it was quite upsetting how much the water bill ran when we were watering the garden a lot.
So, anyhow, that's the update on our food choices. I'm glad that things are looking up and continuing to improve. That 'gold standard' that they mention in regards to local and organic will be met to some degree by our delivery boxes (the cardboard of which I can now recycle, woohoo!), the rain barrel water meets the needs of our own spring plants, and our pet chickens are once again providing us with a few eggs. I'd really like to tread as lightly as possible on the planet...and I do believe it's worth it.